Skip to content

MUI vs Next.js

Based on 24 and 829 real audits

View MUI details | View Next.js details
MetricMUINext.jsWinner
Performance3647Next.js
Accessibility9091Next.js
Best Practices8990Next.js
SEO8994Next.js
Security6872Next.js
TTFB429ms442msMUI
Composite7577Next.js
Performance
MUI
36
Next.js
47
Accessibility
MUI
90
Next.js
91
Security
MUI
68
Next.js
72
SEO
MUI
89
Next.js
94
Composite
MUI
75
Next.js
77

Next.js outperforms MUI in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). MUI leads in TTFB.

When to choose MUI

Choose MUI when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 24 audited MUI sites and 829 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, MUI or Next.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, MUI or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, MUI or Next.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Next.js (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, MUI or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), MUI or Next.js?
MUI sites show lower Time to First Byte (429 ms vs 442 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose MUI or Next.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Next.js scores higher on overall composite score while MUI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback