| Metric | MUI | Next.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 38 | Next.js |
| Accessibility | 91 | 90 | MUI |
| Best Practices | 89 | 88 | MUI |
| SEO | 90 | 94 | Next.js |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Next.js |
| TTFB | 270ms | 289ms | MUI |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Next.js |
Next.js outperforms MUI in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). MUI leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose MUI when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 19 audited MUI sites and 597 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback