Based on 770 and 1 real audits
| Metric | MySQL | Twenty Nineteen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 32 | MySQL |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | MySQL |
| Best Practices | 89 | 100 | Twenty Nineteen |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | MySQL |
| Security | 70 | 68 | MySQL |
| TTFB | 603ms | 401ms | Twenty Nineteen |
| Composite | 77 | 77 | Tie |
MySQL outperforms Twenty Nineteen in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 77). Twenty Nineteen leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose MySQL when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Nineteen when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 770 audited MySQL sites and 1 audited Twenty Nineteen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback