Based on 554 and 1 real audits
| Metric | MySQL | Twenty Nineteen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 32 | MySQL |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | MySQL |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Twenty Nineteen |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | MySQL |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Twenty Nineteen |
| TTFB | 413ms | 401ms | Twenty Nineteen |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Twenty Nineteen |
Twenty Nineteen outperforms MySQL in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). MySQL leads in performance, accessibility, SEO.
Choose MySQL when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Nineteen when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 554 audited MySQL sites and 1 audited Twenty Nineteen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback