Based on 516 and 1 real audits
| Metric | MySQL | Twenty Seventeen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 81 | Twenty Seventeen |
| Accessibility | 88 | 96 | Twenty Seventeen |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | Twenty Seventeen |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Twenty Seventeen |
| Security | 65 | 83 | Twenty Seventeen |
| TTFB | 368ms | 797ms | MySQL |
| Composite | 75 | 85 | Twenty Seventeen |
Twenty Seventeen outperforms MySQL in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 75). MySQL leads in TTFB.
Choose MySQL when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Seventeen when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 516 audited MySQL sites and 1 audited Twenty Seventeen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback