Based on 123 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Native app preferred | Plaid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 48 | Plaid |
| Accessibility | 86 | 92 | Plaid |
| Best Practices | 86 | 93 | Plaid |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Plaid |
| Security | 67 | 80 | Plaid |
| TTFB | 306ms | 240ms | Plaid |
| Composite | 73 | 79 | Plaid |
Plaid outperforms Native app preferred in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 73). Native app preferred leads in no categories.
Native app preferred doesn't clearly lead Plaid in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Plaid when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 123 audited Native app preferred sites and 8 audited Plaid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback