Based on 120 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Native app preferred | Sourcepoint | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 28 | Native app preferred |
| Accessibility | 86 | 75 | Native app preferred |
| Best Practices | 86 | 77 | Native app preferred |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Native app preferred |
| TTFB | 299ms | 152ms | Sourcepoint |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Native app preferred |
Native app preferred outperforms Sourcepoint in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Sourcepoint leads in TTFB.
Choose Native app preferred when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sourcepoint when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 120 audited Native app preferred sites and 2 audited Sourcepoint sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback