Based on 39 and 1021 real audits
| Metric | Naver Analytics | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 38 | React |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | React |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 67 | React |
| TTFB | 454ms | 332ms | React |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | React |
React outperforms Naver Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Naver Analytics leads in no categories.
Naver Analytics doesn't clearly lead React in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 39 audited Naver Analytics sites and 1021 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback