Based on 141 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Netlify CDN | VitePress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 73 | 71 | Netlify CDN |
| Accessibility | 93 | 91 | Netlify CDN |
| Best Practices | 96 | 100 | VitePress |
| SEO | 97 | 100 | VitePress |
| Security | 78 | 71 | Netlify CDN |
| TTFB | 341ms | 69ms | VitePress |
| Composite | 82 | 80 | Netlify CDN |
Netlify CDN outperforms VitePress in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 80). VitePress leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Netlify CDN when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose VitePress when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 141 audited Netlify CDN sites and 3 audited VitePress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback