Based on 161 and 2287 real audits
| Metric | Netlify | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 72 | 49 | Netlify |
| Accessibility | 93 | 90 | Netlify |
| Best Practices | 95 | 90 | Netlify |
| SEO | 97 | 93 | Netlify |
| Security | 77 | 72 | Netlify |
| TTFB | 339ms | 434ms | Netlify |
| Composite | 82 | 78 | Netlify |
Netlify outperforms Priority Hints in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 78). Priority Hints leads in no categories.
Choose Netlify when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Priority Hints doesn't clearly lead Netlify in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 161 audited Netlify sites and 2287 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback