| Metric | Netlify | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 61 | 48 | Netlify |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | Netlify |
| Best Practices | 93 | 88 | Netlify |
| SEO | 95 | 91 | Netlify |
| Security | 68 | 65 | Netlify |
| TTFB | 327ms | 334ms | Netlify |
| Composite | 77 | 74 | Netlify |
Netlify outperforms RSS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). RSS leads in no categories.
Choose Netlify when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
RSS doesn't clearly lead Netlify in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 66 audited Netlify sites and 858 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback