Based on 4 and 1204 real audits
| Metric | Nette Framework | PHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 48 | Nette Framework |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 93 | 88 | Nette Framework |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Nette Framework |
| Security | 74 | 67 | Nette Framework |
| TTFB | 385ms | 468ms | Nette Framework |
| Composite | 78 | 75 | Nette Framework |
Nette Framework outperforms PHP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). PHP leads in no categories.
Choose Nette Framework when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
PHP doesn't clearly lead Nette Framework in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Nette Framework sites and 1204 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback