Based on 177 and 1579 real audits
| Metric | New Relic | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 42 | Priority Hints |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Priority Hints |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Priority Hints |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 236ms | 319ms | New Relic |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Priority Hints |
Priority Hints outperforms New Relic in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). New Relic leads in TTFB.
Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 177 audited New Relic sites and 1579 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback