Based on 173 and 1 real audits
| Metric | New Relic | SpriteSpin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 11 | New Relic |
| Accessibility | 89 | 84 | New Relic |
| Best Practices | 85 | 73 | New Relic |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | New Relic |
| Security | 64 | 66 | SpriteSpin |
| TTFB | 238ms | 52ms | SpriteSpin |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | SpriteSpin |
New Relic outperforms SpriteSpin in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). SpriteSpin leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose New Relic when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose SpriteSpin when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 173 audited New Relic sites and 1 audited SpriteSpin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback