Based on 2 and 803 real audits
| Metric | Newspack by Automattic | WordPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 46 | Newspack by Automattic |
| Accessibility | 84 | 88 | WordPress |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | WordPress |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Newspack by Automattic |
| Security | 63 | 66 | WordPress |
| TTFB | 272ms | 379ms | Newspack by Automattic |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Newspack by Automattic and WordPress are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Newspack by Automattic has a composite score of 75 while WordPress scores 75.
Choose Newspack by Automattic when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Newspack by Automattic sites and 803 audited WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback