Based on 2 and 326 real audits
| Metric | Newspack by Automattic | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 47 | Newspack by Automattic |
| Accessibility | 84 | 88 | Yoast SEO |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | Yoast SEO |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Newspack by Automattic |
| Security | 63 | 68 | Yoast SEO |
| TTFB | 272ms | 441ms | Newspack by Automattic |
| Composite | 75 | 76 | Yoast SEO |
Yoast SEO outperforms Newspack by Automattic in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Newspack by Automattic leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Newspack by Automattic when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yoast SEO when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Newspack by Automattic sites and 326 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback