Based on 228 and 998 real audits
| Metric | Next.js App Router | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 38 | Next.js App Router |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Next.js App Router |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Next.js App Router |
| SEO | 94 | 93 | Next.js App Router |
| Security | 68 | 66 | Next.js App Router |
| TTFB | 308ms | 315ms | Next.js App Router |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Next.js App Router |
Next.js App Router outperforms React in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). React leads in no categories.
Choose Next.js App Router when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
React doesn't clearly lead Next.js App Router in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 228 audited Next.js App Router sites and 998 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback