Based on 271 and 1121 real audits
| Metric | Next.js App Router | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 40 | Next.js App Router |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Next.js App Router |
| Best Practices | 89 | 87 | Next.js App Router |
| SEO | 94 | 93 | Next.js App Router |
| Security | 70 | 68 | Next.js App Router |
| TTFB | 373ms | 356ms | React |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Next.js App Router |
Next.js App Router outperforms React in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). React leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js App Router when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 271 audited Next.js App Router sites and 1121 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback