Based on 228 and 109 real audits
| Metric | Next.js App Router | Vercel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 48 | Vercel |
| Accessibility | 90 | 92 | Vercel |
| Best Practices | 88 | 91 | Vercel |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 68 | 69 | Vercel |
| TTFB | 308ms | 362ms | Next.js App Router |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Vercel |
Vercel outperforms Next.js App Router in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Next.js App Router leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js App Router when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 228 audited Next.js App Router sites and 109 audited Vercel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback