Based on 271 and 117 real audits
| Metric | Next.js App Router | Vercel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 48 | Vercel |
| Accessibility | 91 | 92 | Vercel |
| Best Practices | 89 | 91 | Vercel |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 373ms | 353ms | Vercel |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Vercel outperforms Next.js App Router in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Next.js App Router leads in no categories.
Next.js App Router doesn't clearly lead Vercel in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Vercel when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 271 audited Next.js App Router sites and 117 audited Vercel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback