Based on 424 and 127 real audits
| Metric | Next.js App Router | Vercel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 55 | 50 | Next.js App Router |
| Accessibility | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 95 | 94 | Next.js App Router |
| Security | 76 | 71 | Next.js App Router |
| TTFB | 578ms | 339ms | Vercel |
| Composite | 80 | 77 | Next.js App Router |
Next.js App Router outperforms Vercel in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 77). Vercel leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js App Router when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 424 audited Next.js App Router sites and 127 audited Vercel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback