| Metric | Next.js | Radix UI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 42 | Radix UI |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Radix UI |
| Best Practices | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 68 | 70 | Radix UI |
| TTFB | 320ms | 295ms | Radix UI |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Radix UI |
Radix UI outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Next.js leads in no categories.
Next.js doesn't clearly lead Radix UI in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Radix UI when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 657 audited Next.js sites and 97 audited Radix UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback