| Metric | Next.js | Radix UI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 38 | Next.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Radix UI |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Next.js |
| SEO | 94 | 95 | Radix UI |
| Security | 67 | 68 | Radix UI |
| TTFB | 294ms | 249ms | Radix UI |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Radix UI outperforms Next.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Next.js leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Radix UI when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 606 audited Next.js sites and 81 audited Radix UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback