Skip to content

Next.js vs Sanity

Based on 596 and 31 real audits

View Next.js details | View Sanity details
MetricNext.jsSanityWinner
Performance3831Next.js
Accessibility9091Sanity
Best Practices8889Sanity
SEO9494Tie
Security6768Sanity
TTFB289ms304msNext.js
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Next.js
38
Sanity
31
Accessibility
Next.js
90
Sanity
91
Security
Next.js
67
Sanity
68
SEO
Next.js
94
Sanity
94
Composite
Next.js
74
Sanity
74

Sanity outperforms Next.js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Next.js leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sanity

Choose Sanity when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited Next.js sites and 31 audited Sanity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Next.js or Sanity?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Next.js or Sanity?
Sanity sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Next.js or Sanity?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Sanity (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Next.js or Sanity?
Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 94 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Next.js or Sanity?
Next.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (289 ms vs 304 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Next.js or Sanity for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Next.js scores higher on overall composite score while Next.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback