| Metric | Next.js | Stitches | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 50 | Stitches |
| Accessibility | 89 | 92 | Stitches |
| Best Practices | 89 | 88 | Next.js |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Next.js |
| Security | 68 | 65 | Next.js |
| TTFB | 325ms | 122ms | Stitches |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Next.js and Stitches are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Next.js has a composite score of 75 while Stitches scores 75.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Stitches when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 672 audited Next.js sites and 2 audited Stitches sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback