| Metric | Next.js | Storyblok | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 37 | Next.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 92 | Storyblok |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | Storyblok |
| SEO | 94 | 90 | Next.js |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Storyblok |
| TTFB | 301ms | 270ms | Storyblok |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Storyblok |
Storyblok outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Next.js leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Storyblok when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 627 audited Next.js sites and 10 audited Storyblok sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback