Skip to content

Next.js vs Turbopack

Based on 657 and 136 real audits

View Next.js details | View Turbopack details
MetricNext.jsTurbopackWinner
Performance4046Turbopack
Accessibility9091Turbopack
Best Practices8990Turbopack
SEO9495Turbopack
Security6871Turbopack
TTFB320ms339msNext.js
Composite7477Turbopack
Performance
Next.js
40
Turbopack
46
Accessibility
Next.js
90
Turbopack
91
Security
Next.js
68
Turbopack
71
SEO
Next.js
94
Turbopack
95
Composite
Next.js
74
Turbopack
77

Turbopack outperforms Next.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Next.js leads in TTFB.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Turbopack

Choose Turbopack when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 657 audited Next.js sites and 136 audited Turbopack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Next.js or Turbopack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Next.js or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Next.js or Turbopack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Turbopack (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Next.js or Turbopack?
Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 94 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Next.js or Turbopack?
Next.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (320 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Next.js or Turbopack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Turbopack scores higher on overall composite score while Next.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback