Based on 596 and 17 real audits
| Metric | Next.js | Vercel Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 56 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Vercel Analytics |
| Best Practices | 88 | 91 | Vercel Analytics |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Vercel Analytics |
| TTFB | 289ms | 359ms | Next.js |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Vercel Analytics |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Next.js leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 596 audited Next.js sites and 17 audited Vercel Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback