Based on 822 and 20 real audits
| Metric | Next.js | Vercel Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 60 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 91 | 92 | Vercel Analytics |
| Best Practices | 90 | 93 | Vercel Analytics |
| SEO | 94 | 95 | Vercel Analytics |
| Security | 72 | 71 | Next.js |
| TTFB | 438ms | 336ms | Vercel Analytics |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | Next.js |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Next.js leads in security, composite score.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 822 audited Next.js sites and 20 audited Vercel Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback