Based on 596 and 84 real audits
| Metric | Next.js | Vercel Edge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 52 | Vercel Edge |
| Accessibility | 90 | 92 | Vercel Edge |
| Best Practices | 88 | 91 | Vercel Edge |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 70 | Vercel Edge |
| TTFB | 289ms | 398ms | Next.js |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Vercel Edge |
Vercel Edge outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Next.js leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Edge when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 596 audited Next.js sites and 84 audited Vercel Edge sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback