Based on 596 and 42 real audits
| Metric | Next.js | Vercel Speed Insights | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 47 | Vercel Speed Insights |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Vercel Speed Insights |
| Best Practices | 88 | 89 | Vercel Speed Insights |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 68 | Vercel Speed Insights |
| TTFB | 289ms | 347ms | Next.js |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Vercel Speed Insights |
Vercel Speed Insights outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Next.js leads in TTFB.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Speed Insights when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 596 audited Next.js sites and 42 audited Vercel Speed Insights sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback