| Metric | Nginx | OpenResty | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 44 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 86 | 82 | Nginx |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | Nginx |
| SEO | 91 | 88 | Nginx |
| Security | 67 | 64 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 480ms | 536ms | Nginx |
| Composite | 74 | 71 | Nginx |
Nginx outperforms OpenResty in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). OpenResty leads in no categories.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
OpenResty doesn't clearly lead Nginx in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 974 audited Nginx sites and 42 audited OpenResty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback