Based on 1143 and 67 real audits
| Metric | Nginx | Ruby on Rails | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 54 | Ruby on Rails |
| Accessibility | 86 | 85 | Nginx |
| Best Practices | 88 | 90 | Ruby on Rails |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Ruby on Rails |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 545ms | 615ms | Nginx |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Ruby on Rails outperforms Nginx in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). Nginx leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Ruby on Rails when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1143 audited Nginx sites and 67 audited Ruby on Rails sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback