| Metric | Nginx | Twenty Twenty | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 56 | Twenty Twenty |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | Twenty Twenty |
| SEO | 90 | 81 | Nginx |
| Security | 65 | 58 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 475ms | 1191ms | Nginx |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | Twenty Twenty |
Nginx and Twenty Twenty are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Nginx has a composite score of 73 while Twenty Twenty scores 76.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twenty when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 863 audited Nginx sites and 2 audited Twenty Twenty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback