| Metric | Nginx | TYPO3 CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 58 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 94 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 95 | TYPO3 CMS |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Security | 70 | 71 | TYPO3 CMS |
| TTFB | 585ms | 507ms | TYPO3 CMS |
| Composite | 76 | 78 | TYPO3 CMS |
TYPO3 CMS outperforms Nginx in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). Nginx leads in no categories.
Nginx doesn't clearly lead TYPO3 CMS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose TYPO3 CMS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1262 audited Nginx sites and 39 audited TYPO3 CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback