Based on 1143 and 15 real audits
| Metric | Nginx | WordPress.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 59 | WordPress.com |
| Accessibility | 86 | 90 | WordPress.com |
| Best Practices | 88 | 96 | WordPress.com |
| SEO | 91 | 96 | WordPress.com |
| Security | 69 | 70 | WordPress.com |
| TTFB | 545ms | 393ms | WordPress.com |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | WordPress.com |
WordPress.com outperforms Nginx in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Nginx leads in no categories.
Nginx doesn't clearly lead WordPress.com in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose WordPress.com when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1143 audited Nginx sites and 15 audited WordPress.com sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback