Based on 1 and 38 real audits
| Metric | Ninja Forms | WordPress Multisite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 39 | WordPress Multisite |
| Accessibility | 100 | 88 | Ninja Forms |
| Best Practices | 100 | 82 | Ninja Forms |
| SEO | 85 | 88 | WordPress Multisite |
| Security | 65 | 63 | Ninja Forms |
| TTFB | 10ms | 402ms | Ninja Forms |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Ninja Forms |
Ninja Forms outperforms WordPress Multisite in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). WordPress Multisite leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Ninja Forms when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WordPress Multisite when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Ninja Forms sites and 38 audited WordPress Multisite sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback