Based on 1 and 137 real audits
| Metric | Opal | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 45 | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) |
| Accessibility | 82 | 88 | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) |
| Best Practices | 96 | 84 | Opal |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Opal |
| Security | 72 | 64 | Opal |
| TTFB | 436ms | 330ms | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) |
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) outperforms Opal in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Opal leads in best practices, SEO, security.
Choose Opal when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Opal sites and 137 audited Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback