Based on 4595 and 92 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | OWL Carousel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 44 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 89 | 83 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 89 | 88 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 93 | 90 | Open Graph |
| Security | 71 | 69 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 434ms | 474ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 77 | 75 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms OWL Carousel in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). OWL Carousel leads in no categories.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
OWL Carousel doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 4595 audited Open Graph sites and 92 audited OWL Carousel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback