| Metric | Open Graph | Plone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 47 | Plone |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Plone |
| SEO | 92 | 94 | Plone |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Plone |
| TTFB | 345ms | 764ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Open Graph |
Plone outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Open Graph leads in accessibility, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Plone when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited Open Graph sites and 7 audited Plone sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback