Based on 4595 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | punycode | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 71 | punycode |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 89 | 97 | punycode |
| SEO | 93 | 82 | Open Graph |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 434ms | 1111ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 77 | 78 | punycode |
Open Graph and punycode are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Open Graph has a composite score of 77 while punycode scores 78.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose punycode when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4595 audited Open Graph sites and 5 audited punycode sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback