Based on 4023 and 7 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Pure CSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 58 | Pure CSS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 82 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 88 | 95 | Pure CSS |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Open Graph |
| Security | 69 | 67 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 404ms | 274ms | Pure CSS |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Pure CSS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Pure CSS leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Pure CSS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4023 audited Open Graph sites and 7 audited Pure CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback