Skip to content

Open Graph vs Quill

Based on 3610 and 12 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Quill details
MetricOpen GraphQuillWinner
Performance4629Open Graph
Accessibility8976Open Graph
Best Practices8892Quill
SEO9289Open Graph
Security6771Quill
TTFB380ms439msOpen Graph
Composite7574Open Graph
Performance
Open Graph
46
Quill
29
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Quill
76
Security
Open Graph
67
Quill
71
SEO
Open Graph
92
Quill
89
Composite
Open Graph
75
Quill
74

Open Graph outperforms Quill in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Quill leads in best practices, security.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Quill

Choose Quill when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3610 audited Open Graph sites and 12 audited Quill sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Quill?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Quill?
Quill sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Quill?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Quill?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Quill?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (380 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Quill for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback