Based on 3463 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Request Metrics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 44 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 89 | 86 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 84 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | Request Metrics |
| Security | 67 | 60 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 368ms | 201ms | Request Metrics |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Request Metrics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Request Metrics leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Request Metrics when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3463 audited Open Graph sites and 2 audited Request Metrics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback