Skip to content

Open Graph vs Rubicon Project

Based on 3415 and 28 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Rubicon Project details
MetricOpen GraphRubicon ProjectWinner
Performance4530Open Graph
Accessibility8985Open Graph
Best Practices8777Open Graph
SEO9291Open Graph
Security6664Open Graph
TTFB365ms347msRubicon Project
Composite7471Open Graph
Performance
Open Graph
45
Rubicon Project
30
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Rubicon Project
85
Security
Open Graph
66
Rubicon Project
64
SEO
Open Graph
92
Rubicon Project
91
Composite
Open Graph
74
Rubicon Project
71

Open Graph outperforms Rubicon Project in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Rubicon Project leads in TTFB.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Rubicon Project

Choose Rubicon Project when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3415 audited Open Graph sites and 28 audited Rubicon Project sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Rubicon Project?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Rubicon Project?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Rubicon Project?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Rubicon Project?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Rubicon Project?
Rubicon Project sites show lower Time to First Byte (347 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Rubicon Project for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback