Skip to content

Open Graph vs Sanity

Based on 3361 and 31 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Sanity details
MetricOpen GraphSanityWinner
Performance4531Open Graph
Accessibility8991Sanity
Best Practices8789Sanity
SEO9294Sanity
Security6668Sanity
TTFB359ms304msSanity
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Open Graph
45
Sanity
31
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Sanity
91
Security
Open Graph
66
Sanity
68
SEO
Open Graph
92
Sanity
94
Composite
Open Graph
74
Sanity
74

Sanity outperforms Open Graph in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Open Graph leads in performance.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sanity

Choose Sanity when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3361 audited Open Graph sites and 31 audited Sanity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Sanity?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Sanity?
Sanity sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Sanity?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Sanity (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Sanity?
Sanity sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Sanity?
Sanity sites show lower Time to First Byte (304 ms vs 359 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Sanity for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback