Skip to content

Open Graph vs Sanity

Based on 4430 and 31 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Sanity details
MetricOpen GraphSanityWinner
Performance4931Open Graph
Accessibility8991Sanity
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9394Sanity
Security7068Open Graph
TTFB430ms304msSanity
Composite7774Open Graph
Performance
Open Graph
49
Sanity
31
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Sanity
91
Security
Open Graph
70
Sanity
68
SEO
Open Graph
93
Sanity
94
Composite
Open Graph
77
Sanity
74

Open Graph and Sanity are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Open Graph has a composite score of 77 while Sanity scores 74.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sanity

Choose Sanity when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4430 audited Open Graph sites and 31 audited Sanity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Sanity?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Sanity?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Sanity?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Sanity (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Sanity?
Sanity sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Sanity?
Sanity sites show lower Time to First Byte (304 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Sanity for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback