Based on 3098 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Section.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 25 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 88 | 96 | Section.io |
| Best Practices | 87 | 88 | Section.io |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | Section.io |
| Security | 65 | 68 | Section.io |
| TTFB | 345ms | 411ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Section.io outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Open Graph leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Section.io when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited Open Graph sites and 2 audited Section.io sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback