| Metric | Open Graph | Seravo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 32 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Seravo |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | Open Graph |
| Security | 65 | 68 | Seravo |
| TTFB | 345ms | 401ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Seravo |
Open Graph outperforms Seravo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 77). Seravo leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Seravo when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited Open Graph sites and 1 audited Seravo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback