Skip to content

Open Graph vs Shareaholic

Based on 3415 and 3 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Shareaholic details
MetricOpen GraphShareaholicWinner
Performance4542Open Graph
Accessibility8985Open Graph
Best Practices8780Open Graph
SEO9287Open Graph
Security6661Open Graph
TTFB365ms550msOpen Graph
Composite7472Open Graph
Performance
Open Graph
45
Shareaholic
42
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Shareaholic
85
Security
Open Graph
66
Shareaholic
61
SEO
Open Graph
92
Shareaholic
87
Composite
Open Graph
74
Shareaholic
72

Open Graph outperforms Shareaholic in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Shareaholic leads in no categories.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Shareaholic

Shareaholic doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3415 audited Open Graph sites and 3 audited Shareaholic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Shareaholic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Shareaholic?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Shareaholic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Shareaholic?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Shareaholic?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 550 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Shareaholic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback