Based on 3415 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Slim SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 58 | Slim SEO |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | Slim SEO |
| Best Practices | 87 | 99 | Slim SEO |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 74 | Slim SEO |
| TTFB | 365ms | 458ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 74 | 80 | Slim SEO |
Slim SEO outperforms Open Graph in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Open Graph leads in TTFB.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Slim SEO when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3415 audited Open Graph sites and 4 audited Slim SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback