Based on 3098 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Sortable | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 28 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 88 | 78 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Sortable |
| SEO | 92 | 75 | Open Graph |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 345ms | 361ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Sortable in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Sortable leads in best practices.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is SEO and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sortable when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited Open Graph sites and 1 audited Sortable sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback