Skip to content

Open Graph vs Tawk.to

Based on 3656 and 5 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Tawk.to details
MetricOpen GraphTawk.toWinner
Performance4640Open Graph
Accessibility8985Open Graph
Best Practices8886Open Graph
SEO9293Tawk.to
Security6768Tawk.to
TTFB381ms315msTawk.to
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Open Graph
46
Tawk.to
40
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Tawk.to
85
Security
Open Graph
67
Tawk.to
68
SEO
Open Graph
92
Tawk.to
93
Composite
Open Graph
75
Tawk.to
75

Open Graph and Tawk.to are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Open Graph has a composite score of 75 while Tawk.to scores 75.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Tawk.to

Choose Tawk.to when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3656 audited Open Graph sites and 5 audited Tawk.to sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Tawk.to?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Tawk.to?
Tawk.to sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Tawk.to?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Tawk.to?
Tawk.to sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Tawk.to?
Tawk.to sites show lower Time to First Byte (315 ms vs 381 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Tawk.to for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback