Based on 3415 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Tiny Slider | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 46 | Tiny Slider |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Tiny Slider |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Tiny Slider |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Open Graph |
| Security | 66 | 61 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 365ms | 388ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Open Graph and Tiny Slider are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Open Graph has a composite score of 74 while Tiny Slider scores 74.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tiny Slider when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3415 audited Open Graph sites and 5 audited Tiny Slider sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback