Based on 3463 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Twenty Twelve | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 95 | Twenty Twelve |
| Accessibility | 89 | 98 | Twenty Twelve |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 60 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 368ms | 274ms | Twenty Twelve |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Twenty Twelve |
Twenty Twelve outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Open Graph leads in best practices, security.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twelve when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3463 audited Open Graph sites and 1 audited Twenty Twelve sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback