Based on 3098 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | Twenty Twenty | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 56 | Twenty Twenty |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | Twenty Twenty |
| SEO | 92 | 81 | Open Graph |
| Security | 65 | 58 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 345ms | 1191ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | Twenty Twenty |
Open Graph outperforms Twenty Twenty in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 76). Twenty Twenty leads in performance, best practices, composite score.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twenty when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited Open Graph sites and 2 audited Twenty Twenty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback