Skip to content

Open Graph vs Umami

Based on 3839 and 22 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Umami details
MetricOpen GraphUmamiWinner
Performance4768Umami
Accessibility8992Umami
Best Practices8895Umami
SEO9295Umami
Security6875Umami
TTFB385ms291msUmami
Composite7581Umami
Performance
Open Graph
47
Umami
68
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Umami
92
Security
Open Graph
68
Umami
75
SEO
Open Graph
92
Umami
95
Composite
Open Graph
75
Umami
81

Umami outperforms Open Graph in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 75). Open Graph leads in no categories.

When to choose Open Graph

Open Graph doesn't clearly lead Umami in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Umami

Choose Umami when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3839 audited Open Graph sites and 22 audited Umami sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Umami?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (68 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Umami?
Umami sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Umami?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Umami (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Umami?
Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Umami?
Umami sites show lower Time to First Byte (291 ms vs 385 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Umami for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Umami scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback