Based on 3610 and 10 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | WordPress.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 63 | WordPress.com |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | WordPress.com |
| Best Practices | 88 | 96 | WordPress.com |
| SEO | 92 | 94 | WordPress.com |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 380ms | 232ms | WordPress.com |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | WordPress.com |
WordPress.com outperforms Open Graph in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Open Graph leads in no categories.
Open Graph doesn't clearly lead WordPress.com in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose WordPress.com when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3610 audited Open Graph sites and 10 audited WordPress.com sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback